<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Yakezie.com - Topic: CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Selflessly Helping Others]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 4.5.1</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://yakezie.com/forums/?bloggers-lair&#038;commentluv-vs-google-rankings&#038;xfeed=topic" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/page-2/#p41803</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/page-2/#p41803</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the analysis JT. I have comment luv but it is set to no follow and I do check every link that is in a comment. It takes time but it is worth it to me.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Tony Chou @ Investorz&#039; Blog on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/page-2/#p41684</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/page-2/#p41684</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting post! I&#039;m hesitant to delete my commentluv though. I think Google doesn&#039;t really count comment links that much in their rankings.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Sandy @ yesiamcheap on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/page-2/#p26175</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/page-2/#p26175</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>CommentLuv has never worked with my theme so no worries here.  I&#039;ve seen lots of talk an forums about an unnamed  update that Google is conducting.  I&#039;m ranked #1 on one particular keyword earning most of my Google money but as I&#039;m moving more away from Adsense as revenue I&#039;m caring less about my search engine ranking...I do care about my PR rating though.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>I have been going back and adding "no follow" to years-old links so as not to dilute the value of my links.  I&#039;&#039;m especially careful of the links on my front page since that seems to have the most impact.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>The Passive Income Earner on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26167</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26167</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Very good discussion. Thanks for everyone&#039;s participation as I went and double check my comments. Here is what I found out.</p>
<p>- All links added to my comments seem to end up with &#039;rel=nofollow&#039;. Every single comment I found a link in had the nofollow. I assume it&#039;s word press that does that.</p>
<p>- All the comments with links were useless comments with the intent to promote. I have followed SPF&#039;s initiative and contacted them to offer advertising opportunities instead. All such comments have been removed.</p>
<p>- My commentluv settings are set to nofollow</p>
<p>- I review all comments at the moment so I am fine with my process ...</p>
<p>This discussion was good for me as I will draw the line on who I accept comments from with respect to non-useful or pertinent comments.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>JT_McGee on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26135</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26135</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s my concern.  It comes to a point where its a question of what is the best long-term decision.  I suppose I could moderate every comment and trackback (trackbacks are closed on all my posts...talk about spam) and spend hours upon hours, or I could divert a fraction of the time on a round-up, and give helpful/interesting/valuable links the attention and link weight they deserve.  Last round up I even went out of my way to link as best as I could for the benefit of the included sites&#039; SE rankings.  That has far more value than any one comment, as far as I see it.  Maybe I&#039;m wrong. </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Sustainable PF on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26062</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26062</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Glen Craig - Free From Broke said: </strong></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Isn&#039;t it selfless promotion of each other?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, commentluv also leaves an incentive for people to take advantage and leave their links when they wouldn&#039;t otherwise come to your site. I&#039;m not talking about fellow bloggers, like those of us here, I&#039;m talking about those with spammy sites that do searches for sites with commentluv just to leave their links.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  I&#039;m noticing more search results with comment:"xyz".</p>
<p>As bloggers we should discuss more often, and employ, the use of URLs to cool articles in the links in our names instead of relying on a plugin.  If you have an article related to the one you are commenting on, or, an article you want to promote - then instead of linking to your home page in the "URL" part of the comment, leave a useful link!</p>
<p>Now that being said, i&#039;m still attacking URLs to businesses with advertising solicitation and removing those links.  Lucky for us we don&#039;t get thousands, even hundreds, of comments daily.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Glen Craig on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26060</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26060</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Isn&#039;t it selfless promotion of each other?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, commentluv also leaves an incentive for people to take advantage and leave their links when they wouldn&#039;t otherwise come to your site. I&#039;m not talking about fellow bloggers, like those of us here, I&#039;m talking about those with spammy sites that do searches for sites with commentluv just to leave their links.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Kay Lynn Akers on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26039</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p26039</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s a little sad to see folks stop using commentluv.  Many times I&#039;ve clicked through to another commenter&#039;s post that looked interesting.  </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Isn&#039;t it selfless promotion of each other?</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>LaTisha @YoungFinances on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25995</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25995</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Sustainable PF said: </strong></p>
<blockquote>
<div>When you link to posts with low authority (read: no/low PR) you are stating you are giving them klout/props/whatever.  Your site&#039;s "rep" is being put out there.</div>
<div>So when no/low PR sites comment on your site (ever notice the "big" sites don&#039;t comment as much? - at least at our site!) you are spreading your authority thin.  Likewise, when a commentor puts their URL in their name, they are linking to their site - including business sites!  I&#039;ve been contacting posters who use business links that links on our site are reserved for bloggers and business relationships and have been trying to convert some sales.  I&#039;ve had 5 commentors inquire about our rates and may have just made a $500 sale today.</div>
<div>Link love is link love is link love - give it out judiciously.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Great idea to try to convert the business commenters. I&#039;m going to try that out as well.</div>
</div>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>JT_McGee on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25966</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25966</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pinyo said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
@JT_McGee - What&#039;s the timeframe of your observation? It may be coincidental since I have been observing changes since June 6th. Things are moving around quite a bit since then and there&#039;s a rumor of another "Panda" release coming soon.</p>
<p>At any rate, I think you&#039;re making a good long-term decision getting rid of CommentLuv.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Addressing what you said second, first: you&#039;re probably right.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>I discounted the data with correlations.  However, they aren&#039;t perfect, and I don&#039;t have any sites that would be direct competitors with MM, so the correlation is statistically weak, but relevant.  If you could, tell me, in general, what you experienced yesterday and through today, Tuesday, June 14.  If you&#039;re up, then I&#039;ll dismiss this.  Your input is very much appreciated.  </p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Jason@LiveRealNow on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25965</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25965</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pinyo said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
@JT_McGee - What&#039;s the timeframe of your observation? It may be coincidental since I have been observing changes since June 6th. Things are moving around quite a bit since then and there&#039;s a rumor of another "Panda" release coming soon.</p>
<p>At any rate, I think you&#039;re making a good long-term decision getting rid of CommentLuv.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I don&#039;t believe the rumors.   Google modifies their algorithm twice a day, on average.  Yes, they are updating what they did with Panda, but there won&#039;t be anything as major for a while.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Pinyo on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25941</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25941</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>@JT_McGee - What&#039;s the timeframe of your observation? It may be coincidental since I have been observing changes since June 6th. Things are moving around quite a bit since then and there&#039;s a rumor of another "Panda" release coming soon.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>At any rate, I think you&#039;re making a good long-term decision getting rid of CommentLuv.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Suba @ Wealth Informatics on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25934</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25934</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Haha it doesn&#039;t make you sound paranoid. It is for all our benefits. My whole curiosity stemmed from the fact that google could ding a site because of a "<em>single bad site in the comment section which is generally nofollow</em>". If you did make it dofollow (I have too) I can understand that it might make it look like that you are approving of that site. </p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>JT_McGee on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25930</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25930</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The only reason why I stress about the tiny little things that don&#039;t matter is because I work with clients who target keywords with 20+ million (commercial) competition, and who earn $1000+ per customer.  Getting 99% of SEO right might put you in the top 100 for 20+ million competition, but it takes near perfection to get to the top 3.  I own a few sites, too, one of which is #16 for a keyword with &#62;200 million competition.  To get in the top 10 means I probably never do anything for the rest of my life. LOL.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>MoneyMamba is a testing ground for new concepts/ideas.  So anything I learn from it will be applied on clients&#039; sites that make more in a month than most people might make in their lifetime.  I am a perfectionist when it comes to learning and adopting SEO, but that&#039;s because I have to be.  </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Bloggers generally don&#039;t need to concern themselves with small SEO issues, because engaging content is the product.  That isn&#039;t the case with commercial sites; only a few sites sell a product because they have good content.  They sell product because they get in front of the buyer.  Totally different thing, really, which makes me sound like a paranoid loon when I post here. <img src="/wordpress/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-surprised.gif" alt="Surprised" /></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>JT_McGee on CommentLuv vs. Google Rankings</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25929</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/commentluv-vs-google-rankings/#p25929</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Suba @ Wealth Informatics said: </strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>CommentLuv by default was nofollow. Only recently they changed it to allow the webmaster to control (dofollow all, nofollow all and dofollow only registered users are some of the options if I remember right and the default was still nofollow). And links in the comment section were always discounted by google? as the whole section was byfault nofollow unless you went out of the way to make it dofollow (I am a novice, so I might be wrong). </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>I am NOT disagreeing with your analysis, but I have to say I am a little skeptic. If one nofollow link in the comment section could diss the site so much, how come all the sites that sell links are still doing fine? Google might catch up, but they might also be doing gazillion different things, right? How can you find out exactly 1 thing that is hurting the blog? Panda update didn&#039;t only hurt some sites but they were good to some sites as well. So the other sites which you didn&#039;t see might have come up? If I learned anything from the panda update, it is just this – it was not a one day process. Google seem to be constantly updating stuff. One day I rank higher in SERP for a specific phrase and the other day I go down for the same phrase and come up for another. I am not doing anything different, so how can this be explained?</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>As you said having any plugin is the webmasters choice. So I am not questioning your analysis (which is great, I always wanted to learn more about my traffic but never managed to do it) or about anyone wanting/removing any specific plugin. I just have an academic interest.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>For the record: <strong>I had mine set to dofollow</strong>, which I had adjusted early after installing it, and long forgotten recently when I removed it.  I should have noted this–I forgot this was an option you had to tick, and even that it was an option you could tick.  This answers a lot of your questions.  All comments on my site got a dofollow.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>The major realization for me was that the site as a whole had been performing poorly.  Also, where this commenter had left their link, these pages had dropped 30-40 spots to stay there as reported by webmaster tools, and my own daily tracking.  (I database all daily position changes for all my sites.  I can tell you how any of my sites ranked for keyword X on one specific day, and in 12 different geographic areas.)</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>I&#039;m interested academically, too.  Criticism helps us get to the truth of the matter, which is definitely my goal.  Peer review is important in every study.  I should have mentioned that CommentLuv on my site was set to do follow.  I wish I had remembered that I could go back to nofollow.  At any rate, I&#039;m going to leave the site as is for at least another 2 weeks to gather more data.  I&#039;ve already made the switch…might as well make it worth it.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>SPF made important points there.  Any time you give link love, you give link love.  Comments are discounted in their benefit to the commenters, but not in their cost to the site.  Low PR isn&#039;t really the deciding factor in quality, though, as a high or low PR is not based on authority, but links.  There are plenty of high PR sites (pharamacy sites, for example) that have a high PR, but are considered "bad neighborhoods."  In general, PR is pretty worthless.  Linkbuyers still go stupid for it, though.  Pagerank is green crack.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: yakezie.com @ 2026-04-16 10:27:34 by W3 Total Cache
-->