<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Yakezie.com - Topic: Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Selflessly Helping Others]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 4.5.1</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://yakezie.com/forums/?bloggers-lair&#038;google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking&#038;xfeed=topic" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>JP Money Blogger on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88626</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88626</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>If it puts an end to all the requests for Totally Free Guest Posts, I might even cheer it on!</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>MoneyBeagle on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88356</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88356</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Edward.  I think by making things so inconsistent, the SEO consultants won&#039;t be able to prove their value, thus diminishing their value to potential clients, which in the long run would harm or kill the industry.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Edward Antrobus on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88351</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88351</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Financial Samurai said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Here is something to wonder. How effective can an SEO consultant be if s/he doesn&#039;t have a large platform of proof to show their SEO tactics work?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that is what Google&#039;s whole plan is, by undermining people&#039;s confidence in the ability of SEO, to undermine the actual industry of it.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Financial Samurai on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88346</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88346</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is something to wonder. How effective can an SEO consultant be if s/he doesn't have a large platform of proof to show their SEO tactics work?</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Edward Antrobus on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88330</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88330</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Derek@LifeAndMyFinances said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Do you think this might actually hurt online advertising too? With less information to go on, they really won&#039;t know what site is getting the most visitors for their desired keyword....</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#039;m sure Google would love that as well. At the end of the day, all paid link advertising is is a form of SEO manipulation.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>ontargetcoach on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88329</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88329</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sure it will be an interesting year for SEO changes. I&#039;m keeping my white hat squeaky clean to stay on top of any changes. </p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>OneCentAtatime on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88315</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88315</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Who cares, as along as your hit articles continue to generate traffic and you have affiliate income. None of my top 10 traffic producing articles required any kind of SEO outside of the articles content. They do not have extensive internal links and they do not link back to authority sites either.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have convinced myself to only one SEO technique lately, have readers stay on your article for longer time and the article will gradually move up in Google ranking, often this doesn&#039;t require additional social sharing, though sharing would accelerate the ascent, no doubt.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Just two cents from self-experience.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 06:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Derek@LifeAndMyFinances on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88307</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88307</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Do you think this might actually hurt online advertising too? With less information to go on, they really won&#039;t know what site is getting the most visitors for their desired keyword....</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>MoneyBeagle on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88306</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88306</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edward Antrobus said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Sam likes to say that the SEO field is dead. It looks like he may have a point. I just saw this article that says that Google is going one step further than just shaking up their algorithms to make them harder to guess. Now it seems they are actively obfuscating their results to make it harder to guess how you are ranking.</p>
<p>Of course, the major downside I see here is they are actually making their results less relevant. If they think a page is third best for a search term but show it in the number 12 spot, it&#039;s going to get fewer clicks then it deserves. In the other direction, and more harmful to their reputation, if they rank something at 15 but show it in the forth spot they are highlighting less relevant content over better matches.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.demondemon.com/2012/09/15/google-transition-ranking-and-extreme-index-changes/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Google Transition Ranking and Extreme Index Changes</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sounds interesting and I&#039;ll be interested to see how much buzz this gets as it picks up steam.  It&#039;s interesting that they give the example about how Google will basically toy with you to see how you react.  I definitely think that&#039;s targeting those who are trying to game the system, but it only helps all of us whose main goal is to provide valuable, well written content.  If we write well, link to good sites, provide informational content, and all, in the end we will be exactly where we should be. </p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Edward Antrobus on Google action against SEO: Transition Ranking</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88304</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/google-action-against-seo-transition-ranking/#p88304</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Sam likes to say that the SEO field is dead. It looks like he may have a point. I just saw this article that says that Google is going one step further than just shaking up their algorithms to make them harder to guess. Now it seems they are actively obfuscating their results to make it harder to guess how you are ranking.</p>
<p>Of course, the major downside I see here is they are actually making their results less relevant. If they think a page is third best for a search term but show it in the number 12 spot, it&#039;s going to get fewer clicks then it deserves. In the other direction, and more harmful to their reputation, if they rank something at 15 but show it in the forth spot they are highlighting less relevant content over better matches.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.demondemon.com/2012/09/15/google-transition-ranking-and-extreme-index-changes/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Google Transition Ranking and Extreme Index Changes</a></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: yakezie.com @ 2026-04-12 23:20:06 by W3 Total Cache
-->