<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Yakezie.com - Topic: Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Selflessly Helping Others]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 4.5.1</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://yakezie.com/forums/?bloggers-lair&#038;newness-of-article-and-seo&#038;xfeed=topic" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>Untemplater on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98625</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98625</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Financial Samurai said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Untemplater said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Interesting to know about the meta data and G picking up the republished date.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For those of you who take an old post and republish with a new date - do you lose all of your social media likes and such?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You lose the SM stuff only if the URL is different. So those without dates in their URLs, then no. Hence, one "benefit" of a simpler URL structure. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>aaaah, I see I see. Thanks</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Financial Samurai on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98616</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98616</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eric - Narrow Bridge Finance said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
I switched to no-date URLs a couple of years back with Dean&#039;s Permalink Migration plugin. Worked great and now if I update and republish, the URL is the same.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The only bad thing I&#039;ve noticed is you lose all your social media counts. </p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Eric - PersonalProfitability.com on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98613</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98613</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I switched to no-date URLs a couple of years back with Dean&#039;s Permalink Migration plugin. Worked great and now if I update and republish, the URL is the same.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Financial Samurai on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98611</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98611</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Untemplater said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Interesting to know about the meta data and G picking up the republished date.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For those of you who take an old post and republish with a new date - do you lose all of your social media likes and such?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You lose the SM stuff only if the URL is different. So those without dates in their URLs, then no. Hence, one "benefit" of a simpler URL structure. </p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Untemplater on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98607</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98607</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to know about the meta data and G picking up the republished date.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For those of you who take an old post and republish with a new date - do you lose all of your social media likes and such?</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>frugaling on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98590</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98590</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Google will take into account a republished date. If you "publish" again, the most recent date will eventually be updated on Google. Although, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s one of their priorities to update this date.</p>
<p>I&#039;ve seen traffic boosts, and ProBlogger.net has recommended it. He does suggest improving and modifying the article significantly before republishing. </p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Financial Samurai on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98587</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98587</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>retireby40 said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
You can see the published date and modified date in the meta data. </p>
<p>&#60;meta property="article:published_time" content="2014-01-22" /&#62;</p>
<p>&#60;meta property="article:modified_time" content="2014-01-21" /&#62;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It seems Google takes the published time into account. Not sure about the modified time. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ah hah! Now that is very interesting and what I&#039;m looking for.</p>
<p>Instead of changing the date of the post and risking something, I was thinking it would be wise and better to just update an old post with new figures  and stuff. Hopefully Google can see we are actively updating our content instead of just rehashing our content and rewarding our efforts accordingly.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>retireby40 on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98586</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98586</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>You can see the published date and modified date in the meta data. </p>
<p>&#60;meta property="article:published_time" content="2014-01-22" /&#62;</p>
<p>&#60;meta property="article:modified_time" content="2014-01-21" /&#62;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It seems Google takes the published time into account. Not sure about the modified time. </p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Eric - PersonalProfitability.com on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98585</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98585</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>If you keep the date the same, I don&#039;t believe Google would have anyway to know there is fresh content. When I refresh a post, I usually save as a draft and re-publish with a new date so it gets new life from the homepage and Google considers it to be new.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Financial Samurai on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98583</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98583</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eric - Narrow Bridge Finance said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Yes, as a general rule they can tell what the date is on a post. That is why it is often a good idea to keep dates in your theme.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Not the date, but when I click the UPDATE button and keep the date the same. thx</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Eric - PersonalProfitability.com on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98582</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98582</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as a general rule they can tell what the date is on a post. That is why it is often a good idea to keep dates in your theme.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Financial Samurai on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98578</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98578</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess I'm more interested in knowing if you update an article, but keep the date the same whether there the search engines can tell.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>The College Investor on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98577</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98577</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>You definitely get a freshness bump when you do that - but the bump is short lived if you&#039;re also not getting new links to the content. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I would say a bumped article (meaning new date) will see a 50% increase in search traffic that steadily declines over the first 7 days.  After about 2 weeks, no noticeable difference.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The exception I&#039;ve seen is when you bump it, it picks up traction and social media shares, then it will get much more residual traffic.  I think it has to do with social and with more links being created to the article.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>FrugalRules on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98576</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98576</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I have done the same basic thing as well on a few posts and it seems to do a good job, generally speaking, of boosting traffic to and shares of the post.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>debtroundup on Newness Of Article And SEO</title>
	<link>https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98574</link>
	<category>Bloggers Lair</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://yakezie.com/forums/bloggers-lair/newness-of-article-and-seo/#p98574</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I have gone back and updated some older posts with some more content and then republished them.  It seems to have worked for many of them.  They get more traffic now and are shared more.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: yakezie.com @ 2026-04-11 04:44:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->