You must be logged in to post Login


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Minimum search word length is 4 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Dave Ramsey and ELP kickbacks…ethical?

No Tags
UserPost

9:33 am
June 2, 2012


JT_McGee

Member

posts 723

I just called them ELP advisers; I don't know what they call themselves. That sentence should read fixed and variable annuities – I edited my post a few times, and apparently goofed up that sentence. Anyway, a fixed annuity makes sense when rates are higher. Right now, I agree, they don't make all that much sense. Ramsey's advice in regards to fixed or variable annuities does not change, however.

 

I don't listen to Ramsey's radio show. The last time I listened to Dave was in a PF class in high school; I think we watched every single one of his FPU videos. I've caught a few interviews of his on the topic of annuities in which he just tells people to invest in "a good growth stock mutual fund" and then something about "12% returns…yadda, yadda." I specifically remember a YouTube video where he's on TV telling someone who is very close to retirement age to keep 100% invested in stock funds rather than a variable annuity. No mention of any fixed-income exposure at all. Dangerous advice.

 

Finally, there is not a single tangible difference between a fee-only adviser and a commissioned adviser as it relates to Dave's rationale for using commissioned advisers. He states that people should use a commissioned adviser because it means that they have to speak with their adviser before buying or selling a fund. That is in no way different from the experience with…say, a fee-only RIA. The only tangible difference is that Dave would face tougher disclosure rules, and he likely wouldn't make nearly as much money (money which comes directly from his followers' savings) referring people to fee-only advisers.

 

Again, rejecting mathematics on a $10,000 consumer debt is a bit of a novelty – it's no big deal. Rejecting mathematics and logical decision-making on a multi-million dollar event (retirement) is foolish. It is even more foolish to PAY a supposed "professional" to make poor decisions on your behalf. Why pay a professional fee for what is the most amateur of advice?

 

Please let me know if you get in. I'd be interested to hear what funds you intend to sell to referrals. 

JT McGee – MoneyMamba

URL: MoneyMamba.com 

Twitter: @JT_McGee

Recent Post: Are We Halfway Through Our Lost Decade? (4 Charts Inside)

No Tags

About the Yakezie.com Forum

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2
Forums: 9
Topics: 6383
Posts: 84794

Membership:

There are 13651 Members
There have been 20 Guests

There are 9 Admins
There are 8 Moderators

Top Posters:

My Personal Finance Journey – 3159
Khaleef @ KNS Financial – 3149
Budgeting in the Fun Stuff – 3048
Sustainable PF – 2759
Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter – 2213
Eric – PersonalProfitability.com – 2120

Administrators: The College Investor (1935 Posts), Financial Samurai (1803 Posts), LaTisha @YoungFinances (1715 Posts), Forest Parks (1337 Posts), 20s Finances (1147 Posts), Money Reasons (697 Posts), Chris Johnson (78 Posts), Sydney at Untemplater (0 Posts), Suba (0 Posts)

Moderators: Suba @ Wealth Informatics (1876 Posts), sooverthis (1041 Posts), PK @ DQYDJ (361 Posts), jmichelsen (208 Posts), Ramona (13 Posts), JeremyNJohnson (4 Posts), Moderator (0 Posts), rackgeek (0 Posts)