User | Post |
10:13 am April 5, 2013
| Financial Samurai
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1803 |
|
|
|
Post edited 10:27 am – April 5, 2013 by Financial Samurai
Howdy Folks,
Hope everyone is enjoying the bull market. I really like taking and publishing my own pictures for my site and I'm wondering if you think posting a large 600X400 picture is too much, or a distraction to the content vs. my regular 300X200ish pictures with words wrapped around my context? Please see latest post on FS regarding not working.
The positives of pictures and large pictures are:
* New dimension to the message of the post
* A way to bring personality to the content.
* Search traffic of the pictures.
The negatives are:
* Takes up a lot of real estate.
* Sometimes a book with no pictures is better than the movie.
* Might be able to better utilize the picture space with an ad.
What do you think folks? Is going 600X400 too big? What are more of the cons of having pictures, no matter what size? Why don't more folks publish pictures?
Thanks,
Sam
|
Regards,
Sam
Financial Samurai - Helping you achieve financial freedom sooner, rather than later.
Yakezie Network Founder
|
|
10:27 am April 5, 2013
| Tom Drake
| | Canada | |
| Member | posts 148 |
|
|
|
I just had this exact same dilemma come up. I've been playing around with images, making them unique and search/pinterest worthy.
My first attempt with text on the image became clear that the 300 width wasn't going to cut it any more.
So then I tried again, and I think this one displays nicely and even breaks up the post a bit, which might keep the reader more engaged similar to subtitiles and bullet points.
So while I may still do as small as 300 sometimes, I think 600 is a great way to get more attention on it.
|
|
|
11:09 am April 5, 2013
| maria@moneyprinciple
| | Manchester, UK | |
| Member | posts 679 |
|
|
|
I like larger pictures – just started doing it on TMP and love the way it looks. The beach on the FS is very cool as well. John, has been talking about slowing down the site but…
Maria
|
|
|
11:15 am April 5, 2013
| Edward Antrobus
| | Fort Collins, CO | |
| Member
| posts 1008 |
|
|
|
You could try installing Lightbox. Then you could display a smaller image that fits well with the content, but the reader can click on it to see it full size. The great thing about Lightbox is that it displays in a javascript popup instead of loading a new page. That way, the reader can simply close the popup and be right back where they were in the page.
|
I'm looking for editors, beta-readers, and some demographic research for my upcoming novel, Once Upon a Saturn Moon. If you like reading soft sci-fi thrillers, maybe with a touch of romance thrown in, you can find more information at http://seampublishing.com/once…..aturn-moon
If You Can Read, You Can Cook – http://www.ifyoucanread.com | Think you can't cook? If you can read this sentence, then you can.
SEAM Publishing – http://www.seampublishing.com | eBook formatting and publishing service
|
|
11:18 am April 5, 2013
| Financial Samurai
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1803 |
|
|
|
Edward Antrobus said:
You could try installing Lightbox. Then you could display a smaller image that fits well with the content, but the reader can click on it to see it full size. The great thing about Lightbox is that it displays in a javascript popup instead of loading a new page. That way, the reader can simply close the popup and be right back where they were in the page.
Cool. Will look into that. Just loathe installing more plugins if I don't have to. Thx!
|
Regards,
Sam
Financial Samurai - Helping you achieve financial freedom sooner, rather than later.
Yakezie Network Founder
|
|
8:44 pm April 5, 2013
| The Frugal Path
| | |
| Member | posts 24 |
|
|
|
This is just my own experiences, but I have a harder time reading a post when there is a large picture. I tend to just scroll through the post rather than reading it.
For me a few smaller pictures seems to work out the best. It's a good way to break up the words without taking too much away from what is written.
|
|
|
8:54 pm April 5, 2013
| michael @ financial ramblings
| | |
| Member | posts 196 |
|
|
|
This is an interesting (and relevant) read: link
Just ran across it last night.
As it turns out, I mainly use images as he describes in Example #2 — to shorten the initial lines and make the article more inviting.
You might also consider using captions: link (though I don't)
Anyway, just thought I'd share…
|
|
|
9:07 pm April 5, 2013
| retireby40
| | USA | |
| Member
| posts 1381 |
|
|
|
I resize the image accordingly. If I need a bigger picture so the readers can see the detail (usually some kind of text) then I use a bigger picture. If it's discernible at a smaller scale, then I usually will try to limit to to 300-400 px wide.
Sam, I think the 600 px is too big. It seems too high specifically.
More Con – bigger pictures take longer to download.
Text on image is a good idea too. I will try to do it more.
|
|
|
9:17 pm April 5, 2013
| michael @ financial ramblings
| | |
| Member | posts 196 |
|
|
|
Also: Yes, you may benefit from image search traffic. Beyond this, if you have particularly striking (and relevant) images you might start seeing noticeable traffic from Pinterest.
|
|
|
6:09 am April 6, 2013
| Melissa (Mom's Plans)
| | |
| Member | posts 908 |
|
|
|
I have noticed that many posts that get Pinterest traffic include several (think 5 or more) large pictures, but this drives me crazy! I hate scrolling through the pictures to see a few sentences of the post before the next picture. One big picture is not that bad.
|
|
|
8:44 am April 6, 2013
| Jackie
| | |
| Member | posts 664 |
|
|
|
Post edited 8:45 am – April 6, 2013 by Jackie
I used to think I preferred smaller images off to the right in my text, because they seemed to flow better to me. But then I realized that the blogs I read most all have giant images in them. So I started using a single large picture a while back and it's helped immensely traffic-wise. Here's why: http://tinyurl.com/bsxt5ht
|
|
|
2:15 pm April 6, 2013
| First Million is the Hardest
| | Buffalo, NY | |
| Member | posts 119 |
|
|
|
FWIW, I noticed the larger photo on your last post & I liked the change. The only thing I might be concerned about is that it would slow down your page load times, but I don't know how big of a deal that really is.
|
|
|
2:29 pm April 6, 2013
| Financial Samurai
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1803 |
|
|
|
I appreciate everybody's feedback so far. It seems like Pinterest really could be a nice X Factor to help bring in more traffic, so with some enticing Alt Text and bigger pictures maybe that will happen.
I think I'll give the bigger images a go every other post or for several weeks to see if any positives come out of it. Of course if the picture is boring or low quality then I'll probably keep it smaller.
Thanks!
|
Regards,
Sam
Financial Samurai - Helping you achieve financial freedom sooner, rather than later.
Yakezie Network Founder
|
|
11:14 am April 7, 2013
| Kay Lynn Akers
| | San Diego | |
| Member | posts 904 |
|
|
|
Pinterest is the number two referral source for Weight Chronicles. You can use picmonkey to put your URL on the image also.
|
|
|
5:11 am April 8, 2013
| Glen Craig
| | |
| Member
| posts 1087 | |
|
|
For those with larger pics, how do you handle mobile traffic?
|
|
|
6:36 pm April 8, 2013
| Jeff Rose
| | |
| Member | posts 574 |
|
|
|
I've just recently started using BIG images on posts that I think have a chance to do decent on Pinterest. Luckily, my wife has been helping me.
Not sure if I shared it here, but I added a Pinterest worthy pic to a post that was written 2 years ago. My wife Pinned it and I was able to get over 76,000 pageviews because of it. You can read the case study here.
|
|
|
5:00 am April 9, 2013
| Glen Craig
| | |
| Member
| posts 1087 | |
|
|
Jeff, how much of the traffic do you attribute to the pic vs your wife's account? Certainly you need to start with a good pic but I'd imagine having a strong account would help tremendously as well.
|
|
|
5:09 am April 9, 2013
| Edward Antrobus
| | Fort Collins, CO | |
| Member
| posts 1008 |
|
|
|
Glen Craig – Free From Broke said:
For those with larger pics, how do you handle mobile traffic?
Glen, I haven't worked on it myself yet, but if you are serving mobile traffic with a mobile theme, you can use scaled down images in a separate folder. This post explains how to do that: Delivering a Much Better experience to your your iphone clients
|
I'm looking for editors, beta-readers, and some demographic research for my upcoming novel, Once Upon a Saturn Moon. If you like reading soft sci-fi thrillers, maybe with a touch of romance thrown in, you can find more information at http://seampublishing.com/once…..aturn-moon
If You Can Read, You Can Cook – http://www.ifyoucanread.com | Think you can't cook? If you can read this sentence, then you can.
SEAM Publishing – http://www.seampublishing.com | eBook formatting and publishing service
|
|
11:15 am April 9, 2013
| Pauline
| | |
| Member | posts 274 |
|
|
|
My pics are usually 480px wide, which is quite big, any bigger and I don't see them well on my small netbook. Maybe someone with a bigger screen will, but this is my limit. I use smush.it to reduce them.
|
|
|
10:27 pm April 9, 2013
| Jackie
| | |
| Member | posts 664 |
|
|
|
Nothing special so far for mobile users, but I'll be investigating this http://adaptive-images.com/ to see if it will still work with Pinterest.
|
|
|