User | Post |
6:12 am December 14, 2011
| LaTisha @YoungFinances
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1715 |
|
|
|
I thought this was an interesting article today at Forbes.
6 Big Internet Trends to Watch for in 2012
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ro…..-for-2012/
One of the trends mentions online advertising picking up.
So I wanted to pose the question. With this in mind, would it be better to create several sites with slow growth in mind for all or quickly build up one site at a time?
To me it seems that building a wider base would cause for a more exponential growth rate in terms of advertising dollars while a one site approach would grow more in a simple slope fashion.
Another question? How do we set up Yakezie to benefit from this growth?
|
|
|
6:22 am December 14, 2011
| MoneyIsTheRoot
| | |
| Member
| posts 1456 |
|
|
|
I think that setting up your first site and building it is more important than setting up a wide range of sites right from the start. Now that I have learned a lot from trial and error on my first site, I can probably slowly grow several sites at once and have the same earning potential as I do on MITR. Unfortunately I dont have the time…so Im going with one more site for now.
Quite honestly I think Yakezie is well poised to take advantage of this…we already network and leverage off each other.
|
|
|
6:50 am December 14, 2011
| JT_McGee
| | |
| Member | posts 723 |
|
|
|
If you do start several sites, the best thing you can do is at least upload SOMETHING that Google can index to start the aging process.
|
|
|
8:07 am December 14, 2011
| LaTisha @YoungFinances
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1715 |
|
|
|
I have to admit that this is my reasoning behind building a wider base. It seems like age of a site is a big factor for traffic. So why not start a few sites, get a few posts up and just work on them slowly?
JT_McGee said:
If you do start several sites, the best thing you can do is at least upload SOMETHING that Google can index to start the aging process.
|
|
|
8:11 am December 14, 2011
| Jason@LiveRealNow
| | |
| Member | posts 727 |
|
|
|
JT_McGee said:
If you do start several sites, the best thing you can do is at least upload SOMETHING that Google can index to start the aging process.
When I pick up a new domain, I try to have the site up within a week, and usually post an ezinearticle at the beginning, just to have something up. The moment I have a unique post ready, the eza article comes down.
|
|
|
10:05 am December 14, 2011
| Khaleef @ KNS Financial
| | Fat Guy, Skinny Wallet | |
| Member
| posts 3149 |
|
|
|
Post edited 10:06 am – December 14, 2011 by Khaleef @ KNS Financial
Jason@LiveRealNow said:
JT_McGee said:
If you do start several sites, the best thing you can do is at least upload SOMETHING that Google can index to start the aging process.
When I pick up a new domain, I try to have the site up within a week, and usually post an ezinearticle at the beginning, just to have something up. The moment I have a unique post ready, the eza article comes down.
I learned this strategy from you! Since Google cares so much about age, I want to get indexed right away.
As far as the original question, I'd suggest starting multiple sites, but focusing on one more than the others. Especially if most of them are niche sites.
|
|
|
11:42 am December 14, 2011
| LaTisha @YoungFinances
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1715 |
|
|
|
Do you think there will be more pop up businesses looking to create advertising deals or will it be the same large companies?
It seems to me that businesses follow the money. For example, SEO businesses were few and far between before but now they are a dime a dozen.
|
|
|
12:06 pm December 14, 2011
| 20s Finances
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1147 |
|
|
|
I am just curious, does this get indexed that much faster than a regular post that you publish? Not a critique, just curious.
Jason@LiveRealNow said:
JT_McGee said:
If you do start several sites, the best thing you can do is at least upload SOMETHING that Google can index to start the aging process.
When I pick up a new domain, I try to have the site up within a week, and usually post an ezinearticle at the beginning, just to have something up. The moment I have a unique post ready, the eza article comes down.
|
|
|
12:59 pm December 14, 2011
| Jeff @ Sustainable Life Blog
| | |
| Member | posts 964 |
|
|
|
I think money is the root make a good point – i learned A LOT of things the hard way when I first set up a website – from migration to themes to you name it, i screwed it up at least once.
having the experience has allowed me to easily help pout up a second site.
|
|
|
1:46 pm December 14, 2011
| FamilyMoneyValues
| | |
| Member | posts 812 |
|
|
|
I have put up a new domain – and planned to add sub-domains to it that were almost stand alone guys. In fact I put up a subdomain first – without having much on the root domain – but google didn't seem to want to index either one. Finally after a month or so, I put the root domain up with some content and now both the root and the sub domain are indexed.
Go figure.
|
|
|
8:14 pm December 14, 2011
| LaTisha @YoungFinances
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1715 |
|
|
|
Yeah sometimes you never know what looks best for Google.
|
|
|
4:06 am December 15, 2011
| MoneyBeagle
| | |
| Member
| posts 1466 |
|
|
|
Jeff @ Sustainable Life Blog said:
I think money is the root make a good point – i learned A LOT of things the hard way when I first set up a website – from migration to themes to you name it, i screwed it up at least once.
having the experience has allowed me to easily help pout up a second site.
I still screw up at least one thing every week but over time, the screw-ups (hopefully) have gotten less severe.
:)
|
|
|
11:45 am December 15, 2011
| TightFistedMiser
| | |
| Member | posts 361 |
|
|
|
This is some good information. I have several domains I've never gotten around to building sites for. It looks like I should at least get a placeholder site up to start aging the domain.
|
|
|
2:58 pm December 15, 2011
| Hunter @financiallyc
| | Virginia Beach | |
| Member | posts 707 |
|
|
|
I think your multiple blog strategy could be a winner LaTisha. As others mention above, you definitely have economy of motion when it comes to the mechanics of producing and putting a site out there. Unfortunately the writing doesn't get any easier for me. One idea is creating alternative content to the old 500 word blog articles…really, who has time to read it all? Micro blogging could save a lot of time, and still attract a wide following.
|
|
|
4:09 pm December 15, 2011
| Kevin McKee
| | |
| Member | posts 151 |
|
|
|
There's always the option to buy existing sites that people don't update anymore if you can find them and can afford them.
|
|
|
6:59 pm December 15, 2011
| My University Money
| | |
| Member | posts 129 |
|
|
|
Post edited 7:00 pm – December 15, 2011 by My University Money
Kevin McKee said:
There's always the option to buy existing sites that people don't update anymore if you can find them and can afford them.
Yah, this would be my preferred method. I'm still throwing the offer out there for co-owning a new/used blog with someone!
|
|
|
10:11 pm December 15, 2011
| .
| | Los Angeles, CA. | |
| Member | posts 43 | |
|
|
I do the multiple blog strategy. It works great but you need good management skills and money to outsource things.
|
|
|
7:50 am December 16, 2011
| MoneyIsTheRoot
| | |
| Member
| posts 1456 |
|
|
|
Kevin McKee said:
There's always the option to buy existing sites that people don't update anymore if you can find them and can afford them.
I have made an offer on about 10 different blogs using this strategy…my new challenger blog Smart Wealth was purchased this way… I got it on the cheap and it at least had a PR of 1.
I'm still looking for more blogs to purchase..but its hard getting ahold of the people when their blog is inactive.
|
|
|
8:31 am December 16, 2011
| LaTisha @YoungFinances
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1715 |
|
|
|
Buying abandoned blogs is a good strategy but from what I see, what you pay for the blog, you could just take 6 months to build a new one.
And if you start a new website every month (as I have the habit of doing ) in a year you will have 12 web properties with varying authority.
To be honest, after the first one, building a new site is a piece of cake. I put up a new one last night in about an hr. Then you can outsource most of the backlinking, content and directory submissions to Fiverr. Total cost to start a new site with about 20 posts is around 30 bucks plus around 2 hours after adding to an existing hosting package. give it around 6 months to age and start attracting natural links and traffic and you've got a new domain for hosting advertising.
|
|
|
11:58 am December 16, 2011
| formerbanker
| | |
| Member | posts 12 |
|
|
|
I think the several website approach is the best, but you have to do it over time. I own quite a bit of domains that are aging and every now and then I check up on them. If I find that one has moved up in the serps, then I build it up.
|
|
|