User | Post |
7:23 pm August 21, 2011
| chaircitymatt
| | NC, USA | |
| Member | posts 50 |
|
|
|
I'm thinking of adding a weekly feature on my site highlighting one or two fellow PF bloggers. If I were to focus on either promoting a twitter account or facebook page link (including the website link of course), which would you prefer? I know some have both, and maybe some only have one or the other. Which would you prefer be promoted?
|
|
|
7:32 pm August 21, 2011
| AshleyB
| | |
| Member | posts 101 |
|
|
|
If given the choice, I'd prefer my twitter account be highlighted.
|
|
|
7:55 pm August 21, 2011
| Buy Like Buffett
| | |
| Member
| posts 1682 |
|
|
|
7:59 pm August 21, 2011
| MaximizingMoney
| | |
| Guest
| | |
|
|
Would say Facebook. It seems harder for me to get Facebook likes than Twitter followers.
|
|
8:26 pm August 21, 2011
| The College Investor
| | San Diego, CA | |
| Admin
| posts 1935 |
|
|
|
I agree that Facebook is more valuable than Twitter.
|
|
|
9:06 pm August 21, 2011
| Jackie
| | |
| Member | posts 664 |
|
|
|
Another vote for Facebook.
|
|
|
3:25 am August 22, 2011
| Dana
| | |
| Member | posts 633 | |
|
|
|
Dana
Site:
Gmail:
Twitter:
|
|
6:15 am August 22, 2011
| MoneyIsTheRoot
| | |
| Member
| posts 1456 |
|
|
|
Absolutely Facebook…. Twitter is fairly easy to game…add a bunch of people and some of them will add you, FB definitely does not work like that.
|
|
|
7:02 am August 22, 2011
| Khaleef @ KNS Financial
| | Fat Guy, Skinny Wallet | |
| Member
| posts 3149 |
|
|
|
I would say Facebook, because it's harder to get likes than followers.
|
|
|
9:21 am August 22, 2011
| Eric – PersonalProfitability.com
| | Portland, OR | |
| Member
| posts 2120 |
|
|
|
I like both, but Facebook seems to have a higher engagement rate, so I would vote for that.
|
|
|
11:50 am August 22, 2011
| TightFistedMiser
| | |
| Member | posts 361 |
|
|
|
I vote for Facebook since I rarely use Twitter.
|
|
|
3:07 pm August 22, 2011
| Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter
| | |
| Member
| posts 2213 |
|
|
|
I say Facebook too. I don't do too bad on twitter but could use some FB love. Great idea. Thanks for putting this together.
|
|
|
6:11 pm September 6, 2011
| chaircitymatt
| | NC, USA | |
| Member | posts 50 |
|
|
|
Thanks again you guys/gals for the feedback.
I'll be featuring various one's of you on Fridays on my blog under the title "Featured Facebook Friday #xxxx". It may not give you guys a big bump in traffic since my site is still new, but hopefully you can use the free link love.
|
|
|
7:44 pm September 6, 2011
| smartfamilyfinance
| | |
| Member | posts 103 |
|
|
|
3:53 am September 7, 2011
| Derek@LifeAndMyFinances
| | |
| Member
| posts 1298 |
|
|
|
I'd go with Facebook. It's much more interactive and provides me with much higher volumes of traffic than Twitter.
|
|
|
4:56 am September 7, 2011
| Kay Lynn Akers
| | San Diego | |
| Member | posts 904 |
|
|
|
chaircitymatt said:
Thanks again you guys/gals for the feedback.
I'll be featuring various one's of you on Fridays on my blog under the title "Featured Facebook Friday #xxxx". It may not give you guys a big bump in traffic since my site is still new, but hopefully you can use the free link love.
Great idea! I agree with the consensus for facebook.
|
|
|
2:35 pm September 7, 2011
| Hunter @financiallyc
| | Virginia Beach | |
| Member | posts 707 |
|
|
|
Facebook, it's less spammy, less flakey, and drives traffic!
|
|
|