User | Post |
11:15 am January 20, 2012
| John @ Married with Debt
| | Illinois | |
| Member | posts 239 |
|
|
|
Just read this article that says Google will now be punishing (sandboxing???) sites that display too many ads "above the fold."
http://searchengineland.com/to…..lgo-108613
More info on Google's official search blog:
http://insidesearch.blogspot.c…..ement.html
I don't think I've seen any Yakezie member or challenger sites that would be affected by this, but just in case you run affiliate sites, niche marketing sites.
|
|
|
11:43 am January 20, 2012
| jaicatalano
| | New York | |
| Member | posts 846 |
|
|
|
11:45 am January 20, 2012
| Eric J. Nisall
| | Coral Springs, FL | |
| Member | posts 377 |
|
|
|
I think that's great. There are too many sites out there that show up high on searches, but when you click through, you see a bunch of ads and other junk and have the content hidden in between. This was, I'm hoping, real content pages will get better placement, while still being able to display ads in a smart manner. Of course, the risk is still there for some sites that do provide great content to be penalized because the also display lots of ads up top, which could get pretty dicey, especially if they have to re-design the sites.
|
|
|
12:04 pm January 20, 2012
| ThadP @ thadthoughts.com
| | Austin area, Texas | |
| Member | posts 184 |
|
|
|
I agree Eric.
Eric J. Nisall said:
I think that's great. There are too many sites out there that show up high on searches, but when you click through, you see a bunch of ads and other junk and have the content hidden in between. This was, I'm hoping, real content pages will get better placement, while still being able to display ads in a smart manner. Of course, the risk is still there for some sites that do provide great content to be penalized because the also display lots of ads up top, which could get pretty dicey, especially if they have to re-design the sites.
|
|
|
12:05 pm January 20, 2012
| JT_McGee
| | |
| Member | posts 723 |
|
|
|
Eric J. Nisall said:
I think that's great. There are too many sites out there that show up high on searches, but when you click through, you see a bunch of ads and other junk and have the content hidden in between. This was, I'm hoping, real content pages will get better placement, while still being able to display ads in a smart manner. Of course, the risk is still there for some sites that do provide great content to be penalized because the also display lots of ads up top, which could get pretty dicey, especially if they have to re-design the sites.
I still think the largest loss is indirect – I won't share pages that are over-loaded with ads above the fold on Twitter, Facebook, etc. JMO.
|
|
|
12:54 pm January 20, 2012
| Eric J. Nisall
| | Coral Springs, FL | |
| Member | posts 377 |
|
|
|
I think it all works toward the same end JT. Bottom line is more real pages will be popularized while the BS pages will be dropped making it easier to both find relevant info and be found as a source of relevant info in searches.
|
|
|
1:33 pm January 20, 2012
| Jeff @ Sustainable Life Blog
| | |
| Member | posts 964 |
|
|
|
Nice that they are doing this – I find myself frustrated like eric after hitting one of those pages.
|
|
|
1:34 pm January 20, 2012
| John @ Married with Debt
| | Illinois | |
| Member | posts 239 |
|
|
|
Eric, your thinking is the same as mine. The better Google gets at detecting garbage, the better it is for people like The Yakezie who create good content while monetizing smartly.
The best part of the article is when the author put Google on the spot for violating their own rule by placing a ton of ads above their fold.
|
|
|
7:07 pm January 20, 2012
| Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter
| | |
| Member
| posts 2213 |
|
|
|
Thanks for the heads up. Luckily mine are all below the fold.
|
|
|
9:44 pm January 20, 2012
| Super Frugalette
| | |
| Member | posts 484 |
|
|
|
I made a mental note. I haven't seen any yet.
|
|
|
7:07 pm January 21, 2012
| Barbara Friedberg
| | |
| Member
| posts 1302 |
|
|
|
John, thanks for the link. The blog seems like a good reference. I subscribed to the RSS.
|
|
|
2:14 pm January 23, 2012
| Dr Dean
| | |
| Member | posts 241 |
|
|
|
12:27 am January 24, 2012
| Craig @ PFDiscussion
| | |
| Member | posts 44 |
|
|
|
Thanks John. Yeah, I went thru the pages you referred to. I watched the video too. It's a good move from the Google, especially for the visitors. But Google has not specified how much ads is too much.. moreover, the placement of Google Adsense ads (as shared in the video) is a bit contrasting with that of the recent update. (watch video ) . Anyway, good info by the way..
PS: Moreover, I am unable to use this http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/, actually can't understand things..
|
|
|
8:18 am January 24, 2012
| PK @ DQYDJ
| | The Intersection of Politics, Economics and Personal Finance. | |
| Moderator
| posts 361 |
|
|
|
Toss me on team 'good move'. I do have ads above the fold, but on a personal level I'm less inclined to read (and yes, share) articles where there are too many ads high on the page.
+1 Google, +1.
|
|
|
12:51 pm February 1, 2012
| Modest Money
| | |
| Member | posts 256 |
|
|
|
I think you are safe as long as you use common sense and don't make the ads overpower the content. It is pretty hypocritical of Google to target this though. On some searches there are more ads than results on a page.
Getting penalized definitely isn't fun. So do what you can to jump through the vague hoops that they throw out there.
|
|
|
3:27 pm February 4, 2012
| Michelle (Making Sense of Cents)
| | |
| Member | posts 400 |
|
|
|
4:46 am February 6, 2012
| Smart Wealth
| | Michigan | |
| Member | posts 304 |
|
|
|
thanks for sharing John, good to know
|
|
|
7:20 am February 7, 2012
| Financial Samurai
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1803 |
|
|
|
Hey guys, the one thing I recommend is to not get caught up in what Google says or does. Their real targets are just unreadable link farm blogs that just have garble. I've seen them, and I'm amazed!
Just focus on the writing and networking and I think everything will take care of itself.
Sam
|
Regards,
Sam
Financial Samurai - Helping you achieve financial freedom sooner, rather than later.
Yakezie Network Founder
|
|
7:29 am February 7, 2012
| Craig @ PFDiscussion
| | |
| Member | posts 44 |
|
|
|
Financial Samurai said:
Hey guys, the one thing I recommend is to not get caught up in what Google says or does. Their real targets are just unreadable link farm blogs that just have garble. I've seen them, and I'm amazed!
Just focus on the writing and networking and I think everything will take care of itself.
Sam
Yes, Sam I agree with you. Google or any search engines may not punish a blog/site if it has ads above the fold; instead, those bad neighborhood links, not relevant to the content, sometimes hidden somewhere in the blog are the culprits and Google just wants to catch them and punish them
|
|
|
8:20 am February 13, 2012
| This That And The MBA
| | |
| Member | posts 240 |
|
|
|
Thanks sam for the input. I havent put any advertisements up yet, but I have contacted a few to start doing it. That is this weeks project!
|
|
|