User | Post |
6:17 pm November 27, 2011
| Buck Inspire
| | |
| Member
| posts 1546 |
|
|
|
Hi all,
Lot of questions lately. Thanks everyone! If you were shopping around for a home, would you get a 30 year or 15 year mortgage?
|
|
|
7:42 pm November 27, 2011
| sooverthis
| | Kentucky | |
| Moderator
| posts 1041 |
|
|
|
As low as interest rates are, I'd do a 30-year. You could always pay extra, but if something happened (illness, job loss, etc.) you could scale back to the normal payment for awhile.
|
|
|
9:15 pm November 27, 2011
| krantcents
| | |
| Member | posts 909 |
|
|
|
I had both, although I currently have a 15 year mortgage. There pros and cons to both. The 15 year has a better interest rate, but the payment will be higher and the interest write off is lower. It depends on your particular circumstances and goals. If you get a 30 year, you can accelerate it, but you are paying a higher rate.
|
|
|
11:55 pm November 27, 2011
| The College Investor
| | San Diego, CA | |
| Admin
| posts 1935 |
|
|
|
I've been dealing with this lately myself, and decided to go with the 30 year, and pay the same amount as I would on a 15 year. It ends up costing me about $6k more in interest over the life of the loan, and it will take 16 years, but it gives me huge flexibility, like Andrea said above.
|
|
|
5:30 am November 28, 2011
| Dave @ DebtBlackHole
| | DFW | |
| Member | posts 77 |
|
|
|
The answer is- it depends. It's a tough call to make without specifics (amount of loan, value
of home, income, etc.).
In most cases, I'd probably go with a 30 year mortgage and double
the payments each month to pay it off early. But I'd double the FULL
monthly payment (including taxes & insurance) to accelerate the
payoff. On a 200k loan (5% interest), you'd save almost enough in
interest to buy another home or investment property (approximately
$144,337 – source: Quicken Loans Calculator)!
|
|
|
6:18 am November 28, 2011
| Frugal Confessions
| | Houston, TX | |
| Member
| posts 1622 |
|
|
|
Hands down 15-year for us. We are in a 30 year right now and are looking to refinance.
|
|
|
7:38 am November 28, 2011
| Dr Dean
| | |
| Member | posts 241 |
|
|
|
15 year has been my preference. Most who say they will pay extra don't. If you can truly pay extra and stick to it, then the 30 year does give you flexibility. I like the fact that you build equity quicker in the 15 year, and in this day and age that might allow you to sell the home if you need to.
|
|
|
8:16 am November 28, 2011
| MoneyBeagle
| | |
| Member
| posts 1466 |
|
|
|
I just re-financed into a 15 year mortgage.
If it were up to me, I would advise the 15 year route. I can't argue with those who have said that doing a 30-year (and paying extra) offers a lot of flexbility, but the problem is that this provides additional temptation that many simply can't resist. If a payment on a 30-year is $700 and on a 15-year it's $1,000, many will agree to pay the extra $300 per month, but how many will stick with it over the entire length of the loan?
I sort of chalk it up to the 'out of sight, out of mind' philosophy, that if the payment is already accounted for in the monthly budget, you won't be tempted to change things up, which is probably something many would consider at one point or another in the course of fifteen years.
|
|
|
8:53 am November 28, 2011
| Dominique Brown
| | Washington, DC | |
| Member | posts 510 |
|
|
|
I also recently refinanced into a 15 year mortgage. I believe it comes down to personal preference and your current financial situation. I went with the 15 year because I already invest enough in other areas to meet my investment goals. I also have a personal goal to own my home before 40. So, the 15 year made sense in my situation.
|
|
|
9:10 am November 28, 2011
| 20s Finances
| | |
| Admin
| posts 1147 |
|
|
|
Good question (as always)…
I think it depends on your financial situation. If you are killing it with the income and have a secure job (if that's even possible these days), why not go for the 15.
But, if there is even the slightest risk, I would say go for the 30 because of the flexibility and the idea that because rates are so low, you can probably find a better investment for that extra money.
|
|
|
12:58 pm November 28, 2011
| Dominique Brown
| | Washington, DC | |
| Member | posts 510 |
|
|
|
20sFinances said:
Good question (as always)…
I think it depends on your financial situation. If you are killing it with the income and have a secure job (if that's even possible these days), why not go for the 15.
But, if there is even the slightest risk, I would say go for the 30 because of the flexibility and the idea that because rates are so low, you can probably find a better investment for that extra money.
Get out my head!!!
|
|
|
1:04 pm November 28, 2011
| Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter
| | |
| Member
| posts 2213 |
|
|
|
In Canada, at least where I live, you can't even get a 30 year mortgage plan. Max is 5 years based on 25 or 20 years amortization. It is so different in the states.
|
|
|
1:18 pm November 28, 2011
| Jeff @ Sustainable Life Blog
| | |
| Member | posts 964 |
|
|
|
great question – I agree with a lot of the points here, but dr deans resonates – I think a lot of people who say they would/could pay extra dont end up doing so very often. I'd much rather give a 15 year loan a shot and scrimp until my salary goes up than go for a 30 year. That being said, I do have a very stable job, and I know that's not true for everyone these days.
|
|
|
1:27 pm November 28, 2011
| Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter
| | |
| Member
| posts 2213 |
|
|
|
Jeff @ Sustainable Life Blog said:
great question – I agree with a lot of the points here, but dr deans resonates – I think a lot of people who say they would/could pay extra dont end up doing so very often. I'd much rather give a 15 year loan a shot and scrimp until my salary goes up than go for a 30 year. That being said, I do have a very stable job, and I know that's not true for everyone these days.
Agreed. It is not uncommon for people who bite off more than they can chew.
|
|
|
3:05 pm November 28, 2011
| retireby40
| | USA | |
| Member
| posts 1381 |
|
|
|
Great replies above. I would go for the 30 years loan because the interest rate is so low.
Houses are expensive in California so that will be a factor as well since many people may not be able to afford the 15 years payment.
|
|
|
6:02 pm November 28, 2011
| Mid Life Miser
| | |
| Member | posts 18 |
|
|
|
My vote is a 15 year. However, it also depends where you are in your life. For example, if your planning on kids, you might want the flexibility and lower payments of a 30. Also, you might want top consider a 25…or 20 year note.
|
|
|
8:23 pm November 28, 2011
| Jeffrey Trull
| | CT | |
| Member | posts 134 |
|
|
|
I'd go with 15 any day as long as I knew I could afford it. I think there's something to be said for forcing yourself to pay down the debt as fast as possible. However, with interest rates so low right now, there are definitely arguments for taking the 30 year
|
|
|
11:20 pm November 28, 2011
| Buck Inspire
| | |
| Member
| posts 1546 |
|
|
|
Hi all,
Thanks again for all the excellent advice! Will mull it over.
Hi Corey,
Like I said before, since I can't keep up with the blogging machine. I may as well try to be a question machine!
|
|
|
4:14 am November 29, 2011
| MoneyBeagle
| | |
| Member
| posts 1466 |
|
|
|
Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter said:
In Canada, at least where I live, you can't even get a 30 year mortgage plan. Max is 5 years based on 25 or 20 years amortization. It is so different in the states.
Wow, I've never heard this. What does that mean exactly? Do you have to re-finance every five years?
|
|
|
7:53 am November 29, 2011
| Charles @ MoneyGreenLife
| | |
| Member | posts 318 |
|
|
|
right now, i can't afford 15 year mortgage. But once my equity is built up enough then I would probably consider refinancing to 15 year, provided that the interest rate is significantly lower. Right now, if i have extra money lying around, then i would make additional payment towards the principal. The flexibility really is nice.
|
|
|